Stephen Gianelli's Ongoing Public Attack & Defense of Leonard Cohen, Michelle Rice, Robert Kory & Others 07.05.17

Stephen G39 minutes ago

In July of 2006 and on August 24, 2016, Lynch violated the Colorado restraining order (registered in CA on in 2011) by transmitting a long demand letter to Leonard Cohen, which she then posted on her blog HERE:   https://riverdeepbook.blogspot.com/2016/08/from-kelley-lynch-date-wed-aug-24-2016.html. Lynch knew the order prohibited her from doing so (she was arrested, tried, convicted and sentenced to 18-months in jail for violating the same order in 2012). The presence of this letter on her blog is a powerful admission that she authored the letter and transmitted it in the manner specified on the face of the letter. The fact that Lynch now denies sending this letter despite overwhelming evidence to the contrary speaks volumes about her credibility regarding her denials of the other charged counts (pertaining to communications sent to Rice and Kory).

Commentary:  At no time has Lynch violated Leonard Cohen’s fraudulent restraining orders.  That includes the fraudulent California domestic violence order issued without due process.  Lynch has addressed this fact with the Court.

Stephen G7 hours ago

Another Kelley Lynch lie exposed: The California Court of Appeal opinion in Kory v. Lynch (holding that your 2015 motion to vacate the default J was a non-appealable motion for reconsideration and dismissing the appeal) was filed May 17, 2017 and became final on June 16, 2017. (CRC, rule 8.366(b)(1).) You thereafter had until June 26, 2017 to petition the California Supreme Court for review but failed to do so –  review in the California Supreme Court is therefore precluded. (CRC, rule 8.500(e)(1). Under the exhaustion doctrine, review in the US Supreme Court is barred as well.Clearly, by your standards Kelley Lynch LIED through her teeth when she stated on her blog, on You Tube and in emails, not once but on multiple occasions,  that if she lost in the court of appeal she would “appeal all the way to the US Supreme Court” and that “my chances are as good as the next guy”.Additionally, liar, know this: The two additional orders you are appealing will be affirmed and you will be convicted of the pending 17-criminal counts against you before the end of this year. You will not be able to raise the substantial bail to remain free pending appeal, and you will also be in jail by the end of this year. And, Alan Jackson, Sandra Jo Streeter, Seven Cooley, Robert Kory, Michelle Rice, and Stephen Gianelli are leading, and will continue to lead happy, productive, successful lives – free to live as they see fit. Unlike you, liar, who will be incarcerated.

Commentary:  While Lynch initially intended to appeal her fraud upon the court motion, after consulting numerous parties, she decided not to.  She was advised to focus on the present appeals which, should the decisions be adverse, will be appealed to higher courts.  There is nothing Lynch can do about the fact that LA Superior Court and the Court of Appeals condone blatantly lying to jurors, fraud, perjury, prosecutorial misconduct, etc.  Cohen’s lawyers continue to request extensions in both appeals.  Robert Kory, who has no standing whatsoever, has stepped in as trustee of the Cohen Family Trust. The corporations at issue are not inside the trust and Lynch tends to doubt the fraud restraining orders were assigned to the trust either.  As one attorney noted, Kory doesn’t have standing to be inside the courtroom.  It is of interest to note that Stephen Gianelli, once again, has inserted Alan Jackson and Steve Cooley into his discursive rant.  It’s clear that he continues to link Lynch’s prosecutions with Phil Spector’s prosecutors.  That might explain why Phil Spector and Leonard Cohen’s bullshit gun stories about Spector were at issue during Lynch’s trial.  Leonard Cohen now has three contradictory versions of that story before LA Superior Court.  He has also personally informed LA Superior Court that Lynch never stole from him – just his “peace of mind” and they were in a purely “business relationship.”  Michelle Rice, who views adult strangers targeting minors as a joke, informed Gianelli that his harassment of Lynch made her “richer than fuck.”  Robert Kory asked Gianelli to bcc him on his harassing communications.  Other operatives have cc’d Rice on their harassing communications.  The City Attorney’s instructed Gianelli to continue harassing Lynch and urged him to pass along an absurd message from that Office.  Since the prosecutors from the City Attorney’s Office are incapable of telling the truth, Lynch will disregard their “message.” 

From: Michelle Rice [mailto:mrice@koryrice.com]
Sent: Saturday, July 25, 2015 11:35 AM
To: Stephen Gianelli
Subject: Re: So where is your oft threatened, but never quite filed "motion to vacate the fraud domestic violence matter"? (See 4/14/2015 email)

And who cannot control their emotions?  Booo hooo Kelley Lynch called me a child molester in emails that no one ever reads....

Boooo fucking hoooooo...... man up and put on your big boy pants and shut the f*&k up.

Do me a favor and keep inciting her to file more motions, you are making me richer than f*&k.  In fact, I think I can pay off my mortgage on my $2 million Hollywood Hills home with jetliner views by the end of this year.

Michelle L. Rice, Esq.
Kory & Rice LLP
9300 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 200
Beverly Hills, CA 90212
Phone: (310) 285-1633
Fax: (310) 278-7641

Subject: Fwd: Emails to Kelly Lynch
From: STEPHEN GIANELLI <stephengianelli@gmail.com>
To: Deputy City Attorney Vivienne Swanigan <vivienne.swanigan@lacity.org>
CC: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com>, 

John Penick <mr.synt4xerror@gmail.com>,Ray Lindsey <raymond.c.lindsey@gmail.com>,karen <karen@mccourt.org>,wfrayeh <wfrayeh@da.lacounty.gov>,Washington Field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>

Ms. Swanigan,

Here is an email wherein you recently expressly REQUESTED ME TO SEND several emails to Kelley Lynch clarifying that I have never met or communicated with Sandra Jo Streeter and am not in cahoots with her - which I subsequently did as requested, copy to you.

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Vivienne Swanigan <vivienne.swanigan@lacity.org>
Date: Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 11:01 PM
Subject: Emails to Kelly Lynch
To: STEPHEN GIANELLI <stephengianelli@gmail.com>

Since you are still intent on "poking the lion", could you please send emails (several) to Kelly Lynch stating that you are not connected to Sandra Streeter, have never met her, and you are not involved with a conspiracy with her?  Because, unfortunately, your poking at Lynch and defending our prosecutor is making her focus more and more on Ms. Streeter and a delusional belief that Streeter and you are cohorts in a conspiracy against her.  

Also, could you please not give Lynch any further information about what we are doing/planning?  My intent in emailing you about the hearing was just to let you know what happened as a courtesy, not to give you more ammunition to throw at Lynch. I do not like the fact that I have unwittinglin fueled the fires of Kelly Lynch's imaginary Gianelli-Streeter conspiracy by giving you information about what happened at the hearging.  - Vivienne

*****************Confidentiality Notice *************************

This electronic message transmission contains information

from the Office of the Los Angeles City Attorney, which may be confidential or protected by the attorney-client privilege and/or the work product doctrine. If you are not the intended recipient, be aware that any disclosure, copying,

distribution or use of the content of this information is prohibited.  If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by e-mail and delete the original message and any attachments without reading or saving in any manner.

********************************************************************

NOTE:  John Law appears to be Stephen Gianelli who has indeed created and used fake monikers to target and harass Lynch and others.  That includes the moniker the “14^th Sheepdog.”

John Law1 week ago

Okay, here is what happened in court on 6/26/2017: 1. Lynch's motion to disqualify the entire City Attorneys office was denied. 2. As to discovery compliance, Lynch denied receiving a discovery package mailed to her 16 days before the hearing even though the City Attorney has proof of mailing. Lynch also denied being served with a notice of motion to amend the complaint to add an additional count 17. But the amended complaint has been filed, the additional count alleging a violation of Penal Code section 166 (c) (1) [willful and knowing violation of a protective order or stay-away court order - pertaining to the order issued in January of 2016 prohibiting Lynch from contacting victim/witness Robert Kory except through an attorney]. This additional count caries with it a potential punishment of 1-year in the county jail. lynch is now looking at 10-years in jail if "maxed out". 3. The City Attorney claims that the violation alleged in new count 17 is a change in circumstances justifying a revocation of Lynch's release pending trial on her promise to appear, and setting bail at $20,000 - which without a cosigner who posts a residence + a $1,500 bail bond premium, would require Lynch to await the remaining period before trial in custody. 4. The court set a hearing on  8/1/2017 to hear the City Attorney's bail motion. 5. The court advised that the investigator it appointed to assist Lynch with pretrial investigation was unable to assist Lynch due to his illness. Another instigator will be appointed.

NOTE:  Lynch believes it is relevant that Gianelli once again spelled “obcession” with a “c.”  Lynch and others believe Gianelli is indeed sandra123@gmail.com.  She has continuously reported this harassing conduct to IRS, FBI, DOJ, other authorities, and Google’s Law Enforcement.  It should be interesting to watch the prosecute authenticate a spoofed email that Robert Kory transmitted to LAPD’s TMU.  Lynch has asked IRS to investigate that evidence as it is a fabricated, altered version of her email to IRS posted on her blog as of February 26, 2017.

http://riverdeepbook.blogspot.com/2017/02/kelley-lynchs-email-to-irs-re-city.html

Stephen G17 hours ago

Lynch has a new blog, in which she continues to deny authoring the many emails and letters with which she is charged and posits (again) that I am writing her under pseudonym based on my spelling of "obsession".  (Which I am not.) Where she miscalculated, though, was in assuming there is only one way (e.g. chain of custody) for the prosecution to prove she authored the emails and two letters that she is charged with transmitting to Cohen, Kory and Rice. But see Evidence Code section 1400 ["Authentication of a writing means (a) the introduction of evidence sufficient to sustain a finding that it is the writing that the proponent of the evidence claims it is or (b) the establishment of such facts by any other means provided by law."] She also forget that proving that "Gianelli" is "sandra123" is no defense any of the criminal counts with which she is charged. Her obsession with proving that the alleged harassment of third parties is so great that she is lost sight of the elements of the offenses with which she as charged, just as she lost sight of the issues before the court when she filed her motions to set aside the 2008 Colorado order based on fraud (after requesting its issuance), her motions to set aside the 2006 default  (years after she admitted to the court she became aware of it), her motion to set aside the 2011 California registration of the CO order (ignoring the fact that out-of-state anti-stalking orders are properly registered in CA using form DV-600), when she filed her 2015 tax court case (ignoring the lack of jurisdiction, instead focusing on alleged 3d party harassment), her so called 2016 RICO case (ignoring res judicata and Rooker Feldman, and now complains of a DCA listening to her loud cell phone conversation in an open, public courthouse cafeteria (ignoring the obvious lack of a reasonable expectation of privacy). Hey, what do I know. I just practiced trial law for 37 years. Maybe Lynch will have the last laugh with the jury comes back with not guilty verdicts on all 17-counts - even though she has been sending harassing electronic correspondence to Cohen, Kory and Rice for a decade before she was AGAIN charged for doing so. Not a lot of common sense there.

Stephen G2 days ago

6/2/2017 - Lynch writes on her blog that she did not send the emails with which she being charged in 17-counts, that prosecutors are "lying' about her, that a prosecutor listening to her loud cell phone conversation in the middle of an open courthouse cafeteria was "blatant outrageous misconduct" an that she is (again - what is this the 9th or 10th time) reporting prosecutors to the State Bar. OH, she adds that the criminal case against her 'is definitely going to trial". Good God, what a train wreck.

Commentary:  Lynch will file a motion addressing the ongoing outrageous governmental conduct in the current proceedings.  Gianelli was not at the courthouse, from what Lynch could tell, and is no position to lie that she and her witnesses were speaking loudly.  Her witnesses will submit declarations to the court.

NOTE:  Lynch continues to review the Fact Check Blog, which asks people to contact Michelle Rice, privately with IRS.  The blog is Leonard Cohen’s defense to criminal tax fraud, which he used as an opportunity to steal from Lynch and corporations, and details the tactics used against Lynch which include the fraud restraining orders.  The website also raises issues related to “tax fraud.”

John Law6 days ago

Came across these two Lynch related sites: https://riverdeepkelleylynch.blogspot.com/ and http://kelleylynchfactcheck.com/index.html

John Law1 week ago

I spoke to my source who clarified what she meant by "amended complaint" (sometimes done with a plea to lesser charge). Actually more charges against Ms. Lynch are being added. Cases against her is definitely going to trial.

John Law1 week ago

I am hearing rumors about a possible guilty plea by Kelley Lynch to the charges of violating her restraining order and harassing Cohen's attorneys. More to come shortly...

NOTE:  Lynch will not plead guilty to anything and refuses to speak to the prosecutors who continue to blatantly lie in court.  At no time has Lynch harassed Cohen and/or his lawyers.  They have lied about their own course of conduct.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jVXTY0ATTR8