March 6, 2017 at 6.54 AM

From: Sandra <sandra123@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, Mar 6, 2017 at 6:54 AM
Subject: Your public blog post of March 6, 2016 alleging "retaliation" and "harassment"
To: kelley.lynch.2016@gmail.com

My calm, insightful emails responding to your public disinformation campaign on your blog are not "harassment". This voice mail message that you left for Leonard Cohen, which has now been made public through "Kelley Lynch fact check" is harassment. 

And no jury that hears it (and the jury in Case no 6CJ03685 will hear it under the authority of Ev. Code s 1101) could possibly listen to it and conclude that your communications are not made with the "intent to annoy". No way. (Not to mention many other, simular voice mails and the current crop of threatening messages to Kory/Rice in connection with which you are facing 14-criminal counts.

Second, no one cares about your empty threats to appeal your four 2015 law and motion losses "all the way to the Supreme Court". First, because you have no meritorious federal issues, let alone issues of national import, and Second because the odds of a pro se US Supreme Court petition being granted in connection with a default J that you waited 7-years to challange is less likely than you winning the power ball jackpot three times in a row. (Not to mention that you always threaten to appeal to the US Supreme Court but never do.)

I notice that you did not republish or quote my emails of this weekend, because they point out very effectively why you are going to lose your motions the week of the 23d iin Case no 6CJ03685, why you are going to trial on 16-criminal counts, and why you will be convicted and sentenced to serve years in jail. Time that under current law you will only get day-for-day credit for (meaning that you will serrve 50% of any sentence actually inside a jail cell).

BTW, did you know that you have an outstanding warrant for your arrest out of Bounder, Colorado, steming from your May, 2009 violation of the September, 2008 order of protection, by sending the protected person five emails in a row containing the photograph of a hand with the middle finger extended?

But you are just seeking tax information, right? Yea, right.

Word is gettig out and you fool no one except possibly yourself.

http://kelleylynchfactcheck.com

Commentary:  sandra123's emails are not responding to communications with IRS, FBI DOJ and other authorities posted on Lynch's blog.  sandra123 does not work for IRS, FBI, DOJ and has no right to harass Lynch over her blog posts.  Any VM message the City Attorney attempts to introduce will be reviewed by an expert sound engineer.  

Lynch will appeal any denial of her appeals re. the fraudulent renewal of default judgment and/or the fraudulent domestic violence order.  She decided not to appeal the fraud upon the court motion decision as the court clearly condones fraud upon the court, perjury, etc.  Lynch has addressed that decision privately with IRS as the fraud continues to infest the appeals and it does indeed relate to federal tax matters.  

Several months ago, Lynch was advised that there is a fraud warrant in Colorado.  Lynch did not send those alleged emails, spoke to the DA's investigator, and that individual advised her to either come to Boulder or let the statute of limitations run.  Lynch, in the alternative, contacted an attorney in Colorado.  That situation is ongoing.  The warrant dates to 2009.  Leonard Cohen personally testified that he never heard from Lynch in 2009, 2010, and/or 2011 until - according to his testimony - September 21, 2011 after FTB advised Lynch to obtain the tax information required to file her 2004 and 2005 returns.  The City Attorney is attempting to insert the Boulder matters into the current LA proceedings although they are not part of that matter and are not enforcing the Colorado order.