March 3, 2017 at 9.30 AM

From: Sandra <sandra123@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, Mar 3, 2017 at 9:30 AM
Subject: 3-2-2017 blog posts
To: kelley.lynch.2016@gmail.com



Your claim to the DOJ that you have "no remedy" to expunge the 2011 registration of the Coorado order from CLETS is hardly true. Your remedy (as you well know because you ursued that remedy - because you exercized it) was to file a motion to vacate the registration in the court that issued the order. Not only did you do so, you attended a court hearing, you received an order following hearing denying your motion, and you then excercised your appellate remedies with respect to that adverse ruling - which appeal is currently being prosecuted by you in the Second District of the California Court of Appeal in LC vs. KL. But you concealed that nugget of critical information from the DOJ (and no doubt every attorney you have talked to).


You write in another email blog posted on 3-2-2017 "someone advised me that I may have recently contacted Kory". If that is true, you could not only have your OR status revoked, but you could be charged with additional misdomeanor offenses. Knowing you, you won't stop screwing up and acting out until you are back in custody.

Commentary:  As of this date, the California DOJ has not provided me a remedy with respect to the fraudulent domestic violence orders in their databases.  Lynch did not conceal the motion to vacate and/or appeal from Cali DOJ.  She addressed it with them.  The prosecutor wrote that Kory advised him that Lynch contacted him.  Lynch did not and the fabricated email that is an altered version of an email Lynch sent IRS and posted on her blog remains at issue.  Lynch has asked IRS to investigate this matter as it relates to an email she sent IRS, federal tax matters, Kory's perjured declaration, and Kory's statements related to criminal tax fraud and his potential role.  

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

From:  Sandra  <sandra123@gmail.com> Date: Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 8:19 PM Subject:  To: kelley.lynch.2016@gmail.com As you stand before the court in the morning in a serious criminal case that - if you are convicted - could result in a 9-year jail sentence (which would translate to an actual 4 and a half years behind bars) - keep in mind that the sole reason that you are in that position is not some conspiracy, it is not a result of the conduct of others, your situation is entirely the result of your continual refusal to obey a facially valid order of the court, your prior criminal record of convictions and probation violations, and your 14 year history of electronic harrassment. Commentary:  The reasons Lynch is in this position is due to the fact that she reported allegations that Cohen committed criminal tax fraud, he and his representatives retaliated, and the DA dragged her into the Phil Spector case.  The fraud California domestic violen...
Read more

March 8, 2017 at 10.00 PM

From:  Sandra  <sandra123@gmail.com> Date: Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 10:00 PM Subject: Blog post of today To: kelley.lynch.2016@gmail.com I find it extremely ironic that you are all lathered up about a strightfoward website maining consisting of an archive of pleadings in your various legal matters with Leonard Cohen, with three FAQ;s that consist of stright foward anwers to your primary legal contentions that aree not onlysupported by the evidence but have also been so found by the court. This is ironic due to your many wibsites and tens of thousands of blog posts over the last seven years that consist mainly of your warped, self-serving, and factually and legally unsupported hyperbole about these matters. At a minumum there should be a dispassionate rebuttle to your daily diatribes based on facts and actual court documents and judicial rulings. Commentary:  Lynch is not lathered up about the Fact Check blog that is Leonard Cohen's defense to crimi...
Read more

April 24, 2017 at 11.45 PM

From:  Sandra  <sandra123@gmail.com> Date: Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 11:45 PM Subject:  To: kelley.lynch.2016@gmail.com There is always a  settlement offer extended to every defendant at the pretrial. Indeed, one isssue you tried to raise during your postconviction appeal in 2012 was your claim that your public defenders failed to pass onto you an offer to plead guilty in exchange for a 4 month jail sentence (the implication being you would have take the offer). Your total jail exposure is now 9-years as currently charged. I seriously doubt - given your prior conviction of the same offenses with the same victim, your 18-month jail sentence, and your probation violation and reated additional 6-months in jail, not to mention the lack of remorse you displayed then and continue to display now, that the offer will be that good this time around. But I strongly suggest that you accept any proffered guilty plea that puts you behind bars for less than 2...
Read more