March 2, 2017 at 6.44 PM

From: Sandra <sandra123@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, Mar 2, 2017 at 6:44 PM
Subject: Your blog posts of today
To: kelley.lynch.2016@gmail.com


How in the world would your communications to Leonard Cohen dated 8/24 (posted today on your blog) that you sent via US mail, email (to Cohen) and also copied by email to several third parties (Lasher, Kory, rice) NOT be a violation of the 2008 Colorado order of protection prohibiting you from contacting Cohen directly or attempting to contact him through any third parties except through your own attorney?

Clearly you knew about the 2008 Colorado order (you received it on-the-record and the original order contains your signature), you knew about the 2011 registration of the order (you were arrested, charged, tried, convicted, sentenced, appealed from, then moved to vacate the order) -- all before any of your  8/24 communications.

Clearly, you intended to contact Leonard Cohen, both directly by US mail and by email and indirectly through his counsel.

All of the elements of a wilful violation of the order are present, through multiple prohibited communications.

And you keep doubling down in emails republished on your blog.

Clearly, you want to go to jail.

Commentary:  sandra123 is attempting to elicit information about Lynch's defense.  Lynch has never violated a restraining order and that includes in August 2016.  In any event, the current retaliatory proceedings involve federal matters and should be investigated.  

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

From:  Sandra  <sandra123@gmail.com> Date: Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 8:19 PM Subject:  To: kelley.lynch.2016@gmail.com As you stand before the court in the morning in a serious criminal case that - if you are convicted - could result in a 9-year jail sentence (which would translate to an actual 4 and a half years behind bars) - keep in mind that the sole reason that you are in that position is not some conspiracy, it is not a result of the conduct of others, your situation is entirely the result of your continual refusal to obey a facially valid order of the court, your prior criminal record of convictions and probation violations, and your 14 year history of electronic harrassment. Commentary:  The reasons Lynch is in this position is due to the fact that she reported allegations that Cohen committed criminal tax fraud, he and his representatives retaliated, and the DA dragged her into the Phil Spector case.  The fraud California domestic violen...
Read more

March 8, 2017 at 10.00 PM

From:  Sandra  <sandra123@gmail.com> Date: Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 10:00 PM Subject: Blog post of today To: kelley.lynch.2016@gmail.com I find it extremely ironic that you are all lathered up about a strightfoward website maining consisting of an archive of pleadings in your various legal matters with Leonard Cohen, with three FAQ;s that consist of stright foward anwers to your primary legal contentions that aree not onlysupported by the evidence but have also been so found by the court. This is ironic due to your many wibsites and tens of thousands of blog posts over the last seven years that consist mainly of your warped, self-serving, and factually and legally unsupported hyperbole about these matters. At a minumum there should be a dispassionate rebuttle to your daily diatribes based on facts and actual court documents and judicial rulings. Commentary:  Lynch is not lathered up about the Fact Check blog that is Leonard Cohen's defense to crimi...
Read more

March 2, 2017 at 7.19 AM

From:  Sandra  <sandra123@gmail.com> Date: Thu, Mar 2, 2017 at 7:19 AM Subject: Blog posted, harassing emails To: kelley.lynch.2016@gmail.com I am sure that the emails you are posting on your blog are just the tip of the iceberg, and that in actuality you are sending out far more emails to the City Attorney and his deputies. Have you read Penal code section 653M, or do you simply believe that everything you write is so important and legitimate that you have an unqualified right to say it, to whomever you wish, as many times as your whims dictate? Don't be suprized if you pick up additional charges (if Bruce Cutler alone decides to request charges, that would be hundreds of additional counts) or wind up remanded. You just cannot keep scoffing at court orders and the Penal Code while taunting prosecutors without consequences. Commentary:  Lynch continues to document everything that unfolds for IRS, FBI, DOJ, and other authorities.  Lync...
Read more