March 2, 2017 at 10.41 AM

From: Sandra <sandra123@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, Mar 2, 2017 at 10:41 AM
Subject: Your recent blog posts
To: kelley.lynch.2016@gmail.com



I am afraid that you took the prior lack of criminal cases filed against you (pre-2012) to be somethig other than what it was: The dificulty of locating you, since you were constantly moving here and there.

Had you remained in Los Angeles you would have been prosecuted earlier.

If you think that the 2008 Colorado order is "insanity" then file a motion to vacate it in the Boulder Combined Court. Oh, wait, you already did in 2009 - and the motion was denied.

California is required to register the order. And the California legislature, in its wisdom, has decided that pursuant to Family law Code sections 6400 and following, that all foreign protection orders that were issued under the anti-stalking laws in the foreign jurisdiction will be registered in California on request as domestic violence orders and so indexed on CLETS.

Commentary:  This email raises the failure to file charges against me prior to 2012 for some reason.  Lynch believes there is an actual reason why she wasn't prosecuted in 2010 while visiting LA.  Cohen and his representatives, as well as Gianelli, understood precisely where Lynch was.  California is not required to fraudulently issue a domestic violence order in order to register a Colorado order that is not a domestic violence order.  The fraudulent use of domestic violence form DV-600 is not mandatory either.  Lynch has spoken to many experts about this issue.  Lynch discovered in 2014, when the Colorado court transmitted Cohen's fraudulent verified motion to her, that he checked the stalking box.  Lynch never stalked Cohen.  And, this wouldn't change the nature of their relationship.  Cohen advised the Colorado court that their relationship was a business relationship.  In 2012, before LA Superior Court Cohen testified that he and Lynch were in a purely business relationship.  He also testified that Lynch never stole from him - just his peace of mind - and lied that Lynch failed to file certain tax returns when Cohen willfully refused to provide her with IRS required tax and corporate information for the years 2004 and 2005.  The fact that Cohen raised that issue on March 23, 2012 goes to pre-meditation re. their plan to lie about federal tax and related matters.  The fraudulent domestic violence orders in databases remains at issue and Lynch will address this more formally with FBI in the near future.  

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

From:  Sandra  <sandra123@gmail.com> Date: Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 8:19 PM Subject:  To: kelley.lynch.2016@gmail.com As you stand before the court in the morning in a serious criminal case that - if you are convicted - could result in a 9-year jail sentence (which would translate to an actual 4 and a half years behind bars) - keep in mind that the sole reason that you are in that position is not some conspiracy, it is not a result of the conduct of others, your situation is entirely the result of your continual refusal to obey a facially valid order of the court, your prior criminal record of convictions and probation violations, and your 14 year history of electronic harrassment. Commentary:  The reasons Lynch is in this position is due to the fact that she reported allegations that Cohen committed criminal tax fraud, he and his representatives retaliated, and the DA dragged her into the Phil Spector case.  The fraud California domestic violen...
Read more

March 8, 2017 at 10.00 PM

From:  Sandra  <sandra123@gmail.com> Date: Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 10:00 PM Subject: Blog post of today To: kelley.lynch.2016@gmail.com I find it extremely ironic that you are all lathered up about a strightfoward website maining consisting of an archive of pleadings in your various legal matters with Leonard Cohen, with three FAQ;s that consist of stright foward anwers to your primary legal contentions that aree not onlysupported by the evidence but have also been so found by the court. This is ironic due to your many wibsites and tens of thousands of blog posts over the last seven years that consist mainly of your warped, self-serving, and factually and legally unsupported hyperbole about these matters. At a minumum there should be a dispassionate rebuttle to your daily diatribes based on facts and actual court documents and judicial rulings. Commentary:  Lynch is not lathered up about the Fact Check blog that is Leonard Cohen's defense to crimi...
Read more

March 2, 2017 at 7.19 AM

From:  Sandra  <sandra123@gmail.com> Date: Thu, Mar 2, 2017 at 7:19 AM Subject: Blog posted, harassing emails To: kelley.lynch.2016@gmail.com I am sure that the emails you are posting on your blog are just the tip of the iceberg, and that in actuality you are sending out far more emails to the City Attorney and his deputies. Have you read Penal code section 653M, or do you simply believe that everything you write is so important and legitimate that you have an unqualified right to say it, to whomever you wish, as many times as your whims dictate? Don't be suprized if you pick up additional charges (if Bruce Cutler alone decides to request charges, that would be hundreds of additional counts) or wind up remanded. You just cannot keep scoffing at court orders and the Penal Code while taunting prosecutors without consequences. Commentary:  Lynch continues to document everything that unfolds for IRS, FBI, DOJ, and other authorities.  Lync...
Read more