March 15, 2017 at 10.52 AM

From: Sandra <sandra123@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 10:52 AM
Subject: 
To: kelley.lynch.2016@gmail.com

You are missing the big picture that everyone else sees and will see in a New York minute; especially your juries and the trial judge.

Your legitimate or reasonable time window to “address” legal issues arising from your (pre-2005) business relationship with Leonard Cohen closed YEARS AGO.

First, because all limitations periods to sue Cohen EXPIRED years ago. All tax statutes of limitation expired in 2008.

Second, the 2006 default judgment bars any claims you may have had and expressly finds Cohen owes you no obligations and the time to contest that default judgment expired in 2007. (Note that Judge Hess found in 2014 and in 2015 that it was too late to contest the judgment. Note also that in 2016 Judge Steven Wilson of the federal district court held that the 2006 judgment bars your FEDERAL claims as well.)

Additionally, you agreed to the PERMINANT Colorado protective order issued in 2008 and then signed for it. You were charged with violating it in 2012 (under the very same penal code section that you are now charged with violating in the new case). You had a team of public defenders. A jury found you guilty. Your motion for new trial was denied. Your conviction was affirmed on direct appeal and your habeas petition was dismissed by a panel of judges that noted the evidence against you was strong and your defense was implausible.  That prior conviction is now final and binding.

In September 2015 of Judge Scott Silverman read your voluminous motion to vacate the California registration of the 2008 Colorado order, and HELD that the order was validly registered in CA as a domestic violence restraining order using mandatory Judicial Council form DV-600 in May of 2011 pursuant to Family Code section 6404.

Despite all of the above, you persisted in transmitting written communications to the protected person under the Colorado order – which you admit to doing.

Your persistence may be viewed by you as justified, but it is not reasonable. It is angry, obsessed and unreasonable. And no jury or court will ever view it differently.

And until you get the message, you will always be in trouble.

Commentary:  Cohen, at the time of his death, refused to provide Lynch with IRS required tax and corporate information.  This was and remains obstruction of justice.  sandra123 has argued that all tax statues of limitations expired in 2008.  That is a blatant lie as Blue Mist Touring Company, Inc. and Traditional Holdings, LLC have not filed tax returns that they were required to file.  Cohen and his representatives handled corporate accountings and tax return preparation.  Cohen testified to this fact.  Old Ideas, LLC was formed as a partnership for federal tax purposes.  Lynch has no idea if tax returns have been filed for this partnership.  The fraudulent 2006 default judgment did not alleviate Cohen of his obligation to provide IRS required tax and corporate information due for the years 2004 and/or 2005.  A state court judgment would not alter IRS filing and reporting requirements for those periods.  The tax information was due by the first quarters of 2005 and 2006, respectively.  This is merely Cohen and his representatives fraudulent argument which was presented to the jurors during the 2012 trial.  

Lynch did not agree to any Colorado order issued without her awareness of the allegations, evidence, and/or fraud and perjury used to obtain it.