March 12, 2017 at 5.22 PM


From: Sandra <sandra123@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, Mar 12, 2017 at 5:22 PM
Subject: Lawful court order
To: kelley.lynch.2016@gmail.com



While it is true that the court order that you are being prosecuted for violating must be a lawful one, that issue is determined by the trial court (not the jury) and you have in fact raised that issue through a "motion to dismiss" that will be heard on the 26th. Therefore, if that motion is denied, disposition will resolve the "lawfulness" element prior to trial. The case will then go to jury on the 5-elements enumerated in the pattern instruction.

See Gonzalez, 12 Cal.4th at pp. 816-820; Berry, 68 Cal.2d at p. 147.


There is no real dispute in the evidence as to those factual elements. Therefore, if your motion to "dismiss" is denied, you will in all likehood be convicted. Especially if the jury hears that you were previously convicted of violating the same order and did not stop contacting Cohen and/or in light of the 1101 evidence in the case. Not to mention your attitude and hostility.

Commentary:  sandra123, as is true for Gianelli, actually researches legal issues related to Leonard Cohen and the City Attorney.  There is no valid or constitutional order.  There is an order issued without due process in California that the prosecution is lying about when it states that the California order is the Colorado order.  They are incapable of telling the truth even when it relates to a court order.  

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Declaration of Corey Banks re. Stephen Gianelli, Leonard Cohen, Phil Spector, Etc.

DECLARATION OF COREY BANKS I COREY BANKS declare: 1.                 I am a citizen of the United States who currently resides in Los Angeles, California.   I am over the age of 18 years.  I have personal knowledge of the facts contained in this declaration and if called upon to testify I could and would testify competently as to the truth of the facts stated herein. 2.                 I am a friend and business associate of Kelley Ann Lynch.  I understand how she operates in a business environment, what she is like socially, and view her as family.   Ms. Lynch is someone I care deeply for.   She is the utmost professional.   3.                 At some point, Kelley and I were discussing the entertainment industry.   I approached her and asked if she would work as my personal manager.   I am a rap artist who formerly had a record label deal with Columbia Records.   I am currently working on a new album that I plan to release on April 9, 2019.   As personal managers do
Read more

April 24, 2017 at 11.45 PM

From:  Sandra  <sandra123@gmail.com> Date: Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 11:45 PM Subject:  To: kelley.lynch.2016@gmail.com There is always a  settlement offer extended to every defendant at the pretrial. Indeed, one isssue you tried to raise during your postconviction appeal in 2012 was your claim that your public defenders failed to pass onto you an offer to plead guilty in exchange for a 4 month jail sentence (the implication being you would have take the offer). Your total jail exposure is now 9-years as currently charged. I seriously doubt - given your prior conviction of the same offenses with the same victim, your 18-month jail sentence, and your probation violation and reated additional 6-months in jail, not to mention the lack of remorse you displayed then and continue to display now, that the offer will be that good this time around. But I strongly suggest that you accept any proffered guilty plea that puts you behind bars for less than 2-years, 5-year prob
Read more

Jul 2, 2017 at 8:17 PM

From:  Sandra  <sandra123@gmail.com> Date: Sun, Jul 2, 2017 at 8:17 PM Subject:  To: kelley.lynch.2016@gmail.com There is more than one way to prove authorship of a letter or email, not just the email or return address. There is literally everything under the sun having a tendency in reason to establish authorship, including without limitation, reoccuring topics that are uniquily a matter of obcession by the alleged sender, unique words and phrases comminly used by the sender, a recepeient that she has written to before on these subjects (like the default J aginst her, tax fraud, perjury in connection with the civil J aginst her and various criminal procedings involving the sender and Phil Spector as well a the expres obcession with various third parties referenced in the emails and with her alledged entitlement to money, property, and comissions alledgely owed to her in addition to very unique tax forms pertaining to a single tax year more than10 years ago. Also,
Read more