July 2, 2017 at 8.17 PM
From: Sandra <sandra123@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, Jul 2, 2017 at 8:17 PM
Subject:
To: kelley.lynch.2016@gmail.com
Date: Sun, Jul 2, 2017 at 8:17 PM
Subject:
To: kelley.lynch.2016@gmail.com
There
is more than one way to prove authorship of a letter or email, not just the
email or return address.
There
is literally everything under the sun having a tendency in reason to establish
authorship, including without limitation, reoccuring topics that are uniquily a
matter of obcession by the alleged sender, unique words and phrases comminly
used by the sender, a recepeient that she has written to before on these
subjects (like the default J aginst her, tax fraud, perjury in connection with
the civil J aginst her and various criminal procedings involving the sender and
Phil Spector as well a the expres obcession with various third parties
referenced in the emails and with her alledged entitlement to money, property,
and comissions alledgely owed to her in addition to very unique tax forms
pertaining to a single tax year more than10 years ago.
Also,
other simular letters sent to the same recepient admitted under Evidence Code
section 1101 to prove indentity of the sender.
Finally
(against without limitation) motive?
Who
else has the motive to write to Robert Kory to complain about his alleged
perjury in YOUR CASES, money owed by the estate that he alone is admistering to
you, and the same Cohen related tax documents and 1099s you have been harping
about for a decade in emails just like that one.
You
tend to lose sight of the big picture.
Commentary: There is one way to prove that someone sent an email. That is to prove that the email was sent by the individual - not writing style although there are problems with that issue and the fabricated, altered email originally sent to IRS. This individual has once again attempted to insert Phil Spector into these issues. Lynch does not believe IRS required forms 1099 and K-1 are unique. She believes they are standard forms. Lynch wrote to IRS about Kory's entirely perjured declaration as it raised issues related to criminal tax fraud and is a fabricated narrative signed under the oath of penalty.
Comments
Post a Comment