January 28, 2017 at 8.01 AM

From: Sandra <Sandra123@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, Jan 28, 2017 at 8:01 AM
Subject: 
To: kelley.lynch.2016@gmail.com


You apparently see a conspiracy with "Gianelli" under every rock and behind every tree.
You went so far as to write to Christian Slater's attorney claiming that Gianelli drafted the complaint that the actor's son filed against him and was "advising" on the claim in the courthouse hallway.

What you didn't know (apparently) is that the "legal advisor" who drafted the complaint and was in that courthouse hallway was a tall black man and that "Gianelli" was in Healthrow airport at the precise moment of the hearing and had not been to the US that year. "Gianelli's" ID photo cleared the matter up immediately, as did a copy of the relevant airport documentation.

Simularly, "Gianelli" has not set foot in the US (let alone the vicinity of any LA Court) in 2017. (We verified that as well.)

But by all means keep lying. See where it gets you by way of defense to the pending crimial charges against you. SPOILER ALERT: You will be convicted, because you have no defense.


Oh, wait, I forgot. It's an "IRS matter". Never mind. I am sure once the court hears that defense you wil walk!

Commentary:  This email relates to KL's position that sandra123@gmail.com is most likely Stephen Gianelli and/or Sandra Jo Streeter.  Lynch did write Christian Slater's attorneys.  That situation related to Karina Von Watteville.  KVW was Paulette Brandt's former roommate.  When KVW received Ms. Brandt's rental demand letter in the Spring of 2014, she contacted Robert Kory who apparently advised her to sue Lynch.  KVW subsequently was represented by Stephen Gianelli, who assisted her in overturning a judgment Ms. Brandt won related to the rental arrears, and urged her to file a sham lawsuit.  That lawsuit has been dismissed.  KVW, according to her own public statements and other information, encouraged Christian Slater's father to sue him. At no time have I informed anyone that Gianelli drafted Slater's father's complaint or was at the courthouse for a proceeding in that case.  Lynch wrote Alan Hootnick and others that she saw a clown near the courthouse and thought it was possibly Stephen Gianelli.  The IRS is mentioned as the retaliatory proceedings relate to federal tax matters, IRS filing and reporting requirements, and so forth.  LAPD and the City Attorney have interfered in these matters for over six years now.  

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

From:  Sandra  <sandra123@gmail.com> Date: Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 8:19 PM Subject:  To: kelley.lynch.2016@gmail.com As you stand before the court in the morning in a serious criminal case that - if you are convicted - could result in a 9-year jail sentence (which would translate to an actual 4 and a half years behind bars) - keep in mind that the sole reason that you are in that position is not some conspiracy, it is not a result of the conduct of others, your situation is entirely the result of your continual refusal to obey a facially valid order of the court, your prior criminal record of convictions and probation violations, and your 14 year history of electronic harrassment. Commentary:  The reasons Lynch is in this position is due to the fact that she reported allegations that Cohen committed criminal tax fraud, he and his representatives retaliated, and the DA dragged her into the Phil Spector case.  The fraud California domestic violen...
Read more

March 8, 2017 at 10.00 PM

From:  Sandra  <sandra123@gmail.com> Date: Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 10:00 PM Subject: Blog post of today To: kelley.lynch.2016@gmail.com I find it extremely ironic that you are all lathered up about a strightfoward website maining consisting of an archive of pleadings in your various legal matters with Leonard Cohen, with three FAQ;s that consist of stright foward anwers to your primary legal contentions that aree not onlysupported by the evidence but have also been so found by the court. This is ironic due to your many wibsites and tens of thousands of blog posts over the last seven years that consist mainly of your warped, self-serving, and factually and legally unsupported hyperbole about these matters. At a minumum there should be a dispassionate rebuttle to your daily diatribes based on facts and actual court documents and judicial rulings. Commentary:  Lynch is not lathered up about the Fact Check blog that is Leonard Cohen's defense to crimi...
Read more

March 2, 2017 at 7.19 AM

From:  Sandra  <sandra123@gmail.com> Date: Thu, Mar 2, 2017 at 7:19 AM Subject: Blog posted, harassing emails To: kelley.lynch.2016@gmail.com I am sure that the emails you are posting on your blog are just the tip of the iceberg, and that in actuality you are sending out far more emails to the City Attorney and his deputies. Have you read Penal code section 653M, or do you simply believe that everything you write is so important and legitimate that you have an unqualified right to say it, to whomever you wish, as many times as your whims dictate? Don't be suprized if you pick up additional charges (if Bruce Cutler alone decides to request charges, that would be hundreds of additional counts) or wind up remanded. You just cannot keep scoffing at court orders and the Penal Code while taunting prosecutors without consequences. Commentary:  Lynch continues to document everything that unfolds for IRS, FBI, DOJ, and other authorities.  Lync...
Read more