February 18, 2017 at 7.25 PM

From: Sandra <sandra123@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, Feb 18, 2017 at 7:25 PM
Subject: blog post today
To: kelley.lynch.2016@gmail.com



By law criminal discovery can only be requested from the prosecutor of record. As you know, Ms. Streeter has never appeared in 6CJ03685. Nor did she have any role in your 2012 prosecution and related 18-month jail sentence following your sentencing By law criminal discovery can only be requested from the prosecutor of record. As you know, Ms. Streeter has never appeared in 6CJ03685. Nor did she have any role in your 2012 prosecution and related 18-month jail sentence following your sentencing, including at your 2014 probation revocation hearing.

Nor did your prosecutor in 6CJ03685 tell you that counts 1 and 2 pertained to Kory/Rice - only that as victims or witnesses you should be ordered not to contact them.


Nor have we ever met - let alone in court - as I have told you three times now. That is not "impersonation" liar.

Commentary:  This email relates to Lynch's request for informal discovery from Streeter.  Streeter evidently found the informal discovery request "harassing."  Lynch has been provided with discovery, including four entirely fabricated evidence binders, but has not been provided witness lists and so forth.  Sandra Jo Streeter was the prosecutor during Lynch's 2012 trial and retaliated over probation and Lynch's communication to FBI and DOJ re. the City Attorney's false threat scam.  The prosecutor informed the court in the current proceedings that the restraining order violations related to Kory & Rice.  Lynch has the transcripts and she repeatedly raised that issue with the court.  Streeter, during the 2012 trial, informed the jurors that the Colorado order related to Kory & Rice.  It did not and Rice confirmed that fact during her testimony.  Nevertheless, Lynch was charged with violating orders related to Kory & Rice although no such orders existed.  LAPD's report related to present proceedings falsely acccused Lynch of violating orders related to Kory & Rice.  Once again, as Lynch advised the detective (Madero), they did not exist.  The City Attorney has now confirmed for the Court that the fraudulent sentencing DV orders granted to Kory & Rice, during her 2012 trial, terminated in January 2012 with probation.  The LAPD report falsely stated that Lynch was on summary probation at the time the report was written.  Leonard Cohen testified that when Lynch requested IRS required tax and corporate information, he took those requests to LAPD and/or law enforcement.  Lynch has asked the United States DOJ to review all charges filed against her.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

From:  Sandra  <sandra123@gmail.com> Date: Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 8:19 PM Subject:  To: kelley.lynch.2016@gmail.com As you stand before the court in the morning in a serious criminal case that - if you are convicted - could result in a 9-year jail sentence (which would translate to an actual 4 and a half years behind bars) - keep in mind that the sole reason that you are in that position is not some conspiracy, it is not a result of the conduct of others, your situation is entirely the result of your continual refusal to obey a facially valid order of the court, your prior criminal record of convictions and probation violations, and your 14 year history of electronic harrassment. Commentary:  The reasons Lynch is in this position is due to the fact that she reported allegations that Cohen committed criminal tax fraud, he and his representatives retaliated, and the DA dragged her into the Phil Spector case.  The fraud California domestic violen...
Read more

March 8, 2017 at 10.00 PM

From:  Sandra  <sandra123@gmail.com> Date: Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 10:00 PM Subject: Blog post of today To: kelley.lynch.2016@gmail.com I find it extremely ironic that you are all lathered up about a strightfoward website maining consisting of an archive of pleadings in your various legal matters with Leonard Cohen, with three FAQ;s that consist of stright foward anwers to your primary legal contentions that aree not onlysupported by the evidence but have also been so found by the court. This is ironic due to your many wibsites and tens of thousands of blog posts over the last seven years that consist mainly of your warped, self-serving, and factually and legally unsupported hyperbole about these matters. At a minumum there should be a dispassionate rebuttle to your daily diatribes based on facts and actual court documents and judicial rulings. Commentary:  Lynch is not lathered up about the Fact Check blog that is Leonard Cohen's defense to crimi...
Read more

March 2, 2017 at 7.19 AM

From:  Sandra  <sandra123@gmail.com> Date: Thu, Mar 2, 2017 at 7:19 AM Subject: Blog posted, harassing emails To: kelley.lynch.2016@gmail.com I am sure that the emails you are posting on your blog are just the tip of the iceberg, and that in actuality you are sending out far more emails to the City Attorney and his deputies. Have you read Penal code section 653M, or do you simply believe that everything you write is so important and legitimate that you have an unqualified right to say it, to whomever you wish, as many times as your whims dictate? Don't be suprized if you pick up additional charges (if Bruce Cutler alone decides to request charges, that would be hundreds of additional counts) or wind up remanded. You just cannot keep scoffing at court orders and the Penal Code while taunting prosecutors without consequences. Commentary:  Lynch continues to document everything that unfolds for IRS, FBI, DOJ, and other authorities.  Lync...
Read more