February 28, 2017 at 9.24 AM

From: Stephen Gianelli <stephengianelli@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 9:24 AM
Subject: Your recent public blog posts
To: irs.commissioner@irs.gov

First, your “proof” that I have emailed using a “sandra123” email addy is a sight hilarious  gag from 2010 spoofing your (then) propensity to cc “the 14 Sharmapa” on your wacky, 40x a day spam emails known as “the 14^th Sheepdog”?

(The 14^th Sheepdog – perhaps the funniest satire ever posted on the internet!)

Sorry, I don’t follow you. Satire from my former blog (closed in 2013) that dates back to 2010  - seven years ago - does not have a tendency in reason to prove anything except my acute sense of humor.

And if you don’t even know if my email (posted on your blog) was actually sent to the IRS, how do you know who Sandra123 is? (You don’t, and neither do I – except that it is extremely unlikely to be Alan Jackson, Steve Cooley,  or Sandra Streeter).

Second, I only know what you publish on your blog. You always have an excuse for losing ("perjury", "corruption", "I wasn't served", the order was "fraudulent", "I didn't know about the order" etc.)  HOWEVER, many judges from federal and state courts (e.g. Judge Enchien who denied your motion to vacate the 2008 Colorado restraining order in 2009; Judge Ricclardelli who refused to vacate/overturn your 2012 criminal harassment conviction;  Judge Hess who refused to vacate the 2006 default judgment in 2014 and 2015; Judge Silverman who refused to vacate the 2011 CA restraining order in 2015 and in 2017; Judge Wilson who dismissed your RICO suit - to name a few) have looked at your claims of conspiracy, fraud, "perjury" and corruption and have ALL CONCLUDED that your factual and legal claims are utterly without merit.

Your 2012 jury that convicted you of multiple counts of criminal harassment and restraining order violations concluded the same thing, as did Judge Vanderet who sentenced you to serve 18-months in jail at that time. Ditto the judge who found you had no credible evidence of a "conspiracy" between "Gianelli" and the City Attorney's Office and who then revoked your probation and sentenced you to serve ANOTHER 6-months in jail.

FACE FACTS: You do not have the best track record in court (to put it mildly), your “1385 motion” is groundless, if deemed to be a "demurrer" it is untimely (because your plea has already been entered) and your motion to disqualify the entire City Attorney’s Office is going nowhere. THREREFORE, you will be tried on 16-misdomeanor counts and (if history is any guide) you will not be believed by your jury, and you will be sentenced to serve YEARS in jail but under a new jail regimen that, according to the Los Angeles Times, no longer uses early release to alleviate jail overcrowding. (Meaning, convicted inmates of the LA jail are now serving a much higher proportion of their time behind bars – usually 50% under current state law applicable to custody credits for jail inmates.

LAST, given your admitted lack of remorse and lack of recognition that you have EVER done anything wrong, the court will have no choice but to sentence you to more time than you received in April of 2012, MEANING, that the sentence will necessarily exceed 18-months. (You could be sentenced up to 9-years if convicted of the current charges, unless the prosecution amends to add more charges - e.g. for harassing other victims and/or violating the more recently issued orders.)

None of these observations are "delusional". "Reality" is what happens when those handcuffs tighten around your wrists and you are booked into the LA County Jail and watch that cell door close for 2 or 3 years, not your fantasy outcome that after all these many years of losing the entire federal and state legal system will suddenly see the error of its ways, juries will start believing your outlandish conspiracy theories and you will be vindicated.

Nor would I be offering my personal observations at all if you were not continuing to try your legal disputes (real and imagined) in the court of public opinion through your public web blog (including continuing accusations that I am engaging in impropriety).

Finally, as I said, I have not emailed you under sandra123 or any other pseudonym. Nor do you have any admissible evidence to the contrary – just as you have no evidence that the City Attorney is “going after you” to “because they don’t want the Phil Spector murder conviction from being overturned”.  

I realize your delusions feel very real to you. To those that matter (judges, prosecutors, jurors) not so much.

Commentary:  This email from Gianelli was once again allegedly sent to IRS Commissioner's Staff.  Gianelli appeared concerned that IRS might believe he in fact was harassing Lynch using fake email account sandra123.  Stephen Gianelli has routinely used fake monikers, fake email accounts, and fake names online to harass, slander, target, and stalk Lynch.  He created the moniker 14th Sheepdog to attack the 14th Sharmapa.  The situation was not a hilarious gag and that includes Gianelli's statements on his blog that his dog shits and/or vomits religious pujas onto his carpet and/or the personal attacks on the Sharmapa.  Lynch believes Gianelli created the moniker the 17th Shitzu after the 17th Karmapa.  Lynch received a horrifying email from that account which the City Attorney and others have attempted to victimize Lynch with.  Please see Ann Diamond's piece on Gianelli.  She too, and she has been harassed and slandered by him, concluded that he uses fake monikers such as Mongochili other fake monikers used to harass, target, and slander Lynch.  

As usual, Gianelli has attempted to insert Alan Jackson and Steve Cooley into his harassing communications.  This has been a tactic used against Lynch since Gianelli began harassing her and others in 2009.  

Carolyn Enichen denied Lynch's motion and informed Lynch that she agreed to the PPO.  Lynch did not agree to entry of any PPO based upon fraud and perjury that she was unaware of during the Colorado restraining order proceedings.  She would have appealed this issue but, from late February 2009 through April 2014, the Boulder Combined Court advised Lynch and others that their permanent order expired on February 15, 2009, their temporary order was vacated on September 2, 2008, and Lynch's motion to dismiss (quash) was entered on January 12, 2009.  As Lynch left Colorado permanently in December 2008, she assumed she wasn't served documents but had no reason to believe the court employees were lying or misleading her.  Ricciardelli took the position that service is not an issue with respect to the Colorado order that the jurors were informed in 2012 Lynch violated.  Lynch doesn't agree with any judicial assessment that fails to comport with due process.  However, service re. the fraud California domestic violence order remains at issue as does the court's lack of jurisdiction.  Hess, without any evidence proving a Jane Doe exists, took the position that Lynch was subserved Cohen's lawsuit.  She was not and that situation is far from over.  That would include the use of the lawsuit to defraud Lynch, corporations, file and amend Leonard Cohen's federal and state tax returns, used to obtain fraudulent tax refunds, and further used to defend Leonard Cohen with an IRS fraud unit re. the allegations that he committed criminal tax fraud.  Silverman informed Lynch that she should have argued issues related to the fraudulent domestic violence order when she was unaware of them.  This is an outrageous legal argument and the jurors were advised in 2012, via the juror verdict forms, that Lynch violated the Colorado order which is not the fraud Cali domestic violence order and/or the Colorado order.  Wilson evidently argued that criminal conduct is litigation protected.  Lynch will eventually file a RICO suit but will have representation at that time as her fee waivers are constantly at issue and used to discriminate against her while denying her access to the court system.

The jurors during Lynch's 2012 trial wanted to hear from IRS.  They apparently thought they were hearing a federal tax case and informed Lynch's lawyer of this during debriefing.  One juror relied on Streeter's false statements about corporate assets and informed Lynch's lawyer that he felt sorry for Cohen which is juror misconduct.  Lynch has no idea what Barela was doing during the probation retaliation.  He refused to review evidence, hear the Brady motion, and was reprehensibly rude to Lynch's witness, Paulette Brandt.  The prosecutor lied to Barela that Lynch never met with FBI.  Lynch has met with FBI and communicated with them continuously and extensively.  

Lynch believes her 1385 motion was meritorious.  The Court refused to recuse the City Attorney's office although there are in fact conflicts of interest and one of them involves their legal representation of LAPD and the fact that LAPD works for the City Attorney and other local government actors.  These matters will become issues on appeal, if necessary.   

Gianelli believes he has a right to publicly attack and slander Lynch.  He's similar to Cohen who preferred going unchallenged in court.  This allowed him to submit fraudulent misrepresentations, perjured declarations, fabricated evidence, etc. to numerous courts. 

For some reason, Gianelli raised Phil Spector.  Lynch doubts it is merely gratuitous.   

Finally, the City Attorney instructed Gianelli to advise Lynch that they are not in a legal conspiracy with Gianelli.  Lynch takes nothing that anyone in that office says at face value and believes the situation demands an investigation.  

.
See Ann Diamond piece on Gianelli here:

http://riverdeepbook.blogspot.com/2015/06/ann-diamond-on-stephen-gianelli_25.html

See Dan Meade's letter, submitted to LA Superior Court in these proceedings, here:

http://gianellistalker.blogspot.com/2017/04/statements-by-individual-targeted-by.html