February 21, 2017 at 9.49 AM

From: Sandra <sandra123@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 9:49 AM
Subject: 
To: paulettebrandt8@gmail.com



https://www.courts.state.co.us/Forms/PDF/JDF%20395%20Instructions%20for%20Restrained%20%20Person%20to%20Modify%20Dismiss%20PO%20(FINAL)%20R12%2013.pdf

NOTE: “If, after the issuance of the Permanent Protection Order, you have been convicted of or plead guilty to any misdemeanor or felony against the Protected Person, other than the original offense, if any, that formed the basis for the issuance of the protection order, then the protection order remains permanent and must not be modified or dismissed by the Court. It is important to understand that any violations after the permanent protection order is issued are taken into consideration.”


NOTE: “You must complete a fingerprint-based criminal history record check prior to filing your Motion.”


Commentary:  This email addresses the fact that the Colorado court refused to vacate and/or terminate Cohen's restraining order after his death and transmit that information into the local, state, and federal databases to which the original order was transmitted.  Lynch has asked the California DOJ for a remedy and will now ask the Colorado DOJ for a remedy with respect to this issue.  Lynch is not asking for a modification.  There is no protected party and he now permanently resides in a Canadian cemetary and never had any ties whatsoever to Colorado.  Lynch never violated the Colorado order.  The jurors were mislead when they were informed, on the verdict forms, that Lynch violated the Colorado order.  Streeter herself informed the Court that Lynch violated the California domestic violence order and the Court took judicial notice of that fact.  VAWA is inapplicable to both the Colorado order (which is not a domestic violence order) and/or the California domestic violence order (issued without any due process whatsoever).

 Paulette Brandt was copied on this harassing communication.  She continues to be harassed.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

From:  Sandra  <sandra123@gmail.com> Date: Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 8:19 PM Subject:  To: kelley.lynch.2016@gmail.com As you stand before the court in the morning in a serious criminal case that - if you are convicted - could result in a 9-year jail sentence (which would translate to an actual 4 and a half years behind bars) - keep in mind that the sole reason that you are in that position is not some conspiracy, it is not a result of the conduct of others, your situation is entirely the result of your continual refusal to obey a facially valid order of the court, your prior criminal record of convictions and probation violations, and your 14 year history of electronic harrassment. Commentary:  The reasons Lynch is in this position is due to the fact that she reported allegations that Cohen committed criminal tax fraud, he and his representatives retaliated, and the DA dragged her into the Phil Spector case.  The fraud California domestic violen...
Read more

March 8, 2017 at 10.00 PM

From:  Sandra  <sandra123@gmail.com> Date: Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 10:00 PM Subject: Blog post of today To: kelley.lynch.2016@gmail.com I find it extremely ironic that you are all lathered up about a strightfoward website maining consisting of an archive of pleadings in your various legal matters with Leonard Cohen, with three FAQ;s that consist of stright foward anwers to your primary legal contentions that aree not onlysupported by the evidence but have also been so found by the court. This is ironic due to your many wibsites and tens of thousands of blog posts over the last seven years that consist mainly of your warped, self-serving, and factually and legally unsupported hyperbole about these matters. At a minumum there should be a dispassionate rebuttle to your daily diatribes based on facts and actual court documents and judicial rulings. Commentary:  Lynch is not lathered up about the Fact Check blog that is Leonard Cohen's defense to crimi...
Read more

March 2, 2017 at 7.19 AM

From:  Sandra  <sandra123@gmail.com> Date: Thu, Mar 2, 2017 at 7:19 AM Subject: Blog posted, harassing emails To: kelley.lynch.2016@gmail.com I am sure that the emails you are posting on your blog are just the tip of the iceberg, and that in actuality you are sending out far more emails to the City Attorney and his deputies. Have you read Penal code section 653M, or do you simply believe that everything you write is so important and legitimate that you have an unqualified right to say it, to whomever you wish, as many times as your whims dictate? Don't be suprized if you pick up additional charges (if Bruce Cutler alone decides to request charges, that would be hundreds of additional counts) or wind up remanded. You just cannot keep scoffing at court orders and the Penal Code while taunting prosecutors without consequences. Commentary:  Lynch continues to document everything that unfolds for IRS, FBI, DOJ, and other authorities.  Lync...
Read more