February 21, 2017 at 8.52 AM

From: Sandra <sandra123@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 8:52 AM
Subject: Why the sentencing judge's hands will be tied - in Judge Robert C. Vanderet's own words on 4/17/2012
To: paulettebrand8@gmail.com
Cc: GlobalDistribution@spamdog.net

Kelley Lynch at her April 17, 2012 sentencing hearing:

“I feel that I can stay away from Leonard Cohen. I’m willing to go to anger management. I’m willing to take anything the judge suggests…”. (TR 4/17/2012, 635: 2-5.)

Robert C. Vanderet  at the same hearing:

The defendant …. has displayed an utter contempt for the judicial process and for judicial orders. This behavior was all done in contempt of repeated orders  by the civil courts that she not contact Mr. Cohen. […] The defendant has indicated expressly her belief that restraining orders will have no effect on her behavior. Has said so a number of times in evidence that we have heard. She’s also shown no remorse nor glimmer of acknowledgement of  wrongdoing for her behavior, even up to this moment. And in light of all of those factors, this court has very limited tools at its disposal”. (TR 4/17/2012, 636: 23- 637: 1.)

What, if anything, has changed about the sentencing picture since those words were uttered in 2012?

First, Kelley Lynch has NOT stayed away from Leonard Cohen. She violated her probation in 2013 with continued harassing emails and received an additional 6-months in jail.

Second, she has repeatedly stated in mass emails and on her blog that the order prohibiting her from contacting Cohen is “illegal” and “fraudulent” and that she is not bound by it and cannot be punished for violating it.

Third, she has continued to violate the order, through Cohen’s death in 2016.

And even after new charges have been filed, charges that could result in a sentence to 9-years in jail, she continues to show not a shred of remorse nor glimmer of acknowledgment of wrongdoing.

If Judge Robert C. Vanderet has few tools at his disposal in 2012, then then the sentencing judge in 2017 will have even fewer. Can there be any doubt at all that the sentence will be far more severe than in 2012?

Not to anyone with an ounce of common sense.

Commentary:  Lynch did feel that she could stay away from Cohen since he personally testified that he hadn't seen her since 2004.  Lynch wasn't really willing to go to anger management but now understands that this was part of the fraudulent domestic violence sentencing requirements that included an attempt to extort domestic violence fines/fees from her.  The juror verdict forms clearly informed the jurors that Lynch violated the Colorado order which is not a domestic violence order.  Streeter informed the court numerous times that Lynch violated the fraudulent California domestic violence order, case no. BQ033717.  The jurors were not informed that the Colorado order was fraudulently registered in California as a domestic violence order and Lynch was not notified of that fact.  Robert Vanderet has blatantly lied about Lynch having utter contempt for the judicial process and judicial orders.  It is LA Superior Court, and local government actors, who have absolute contempt for sister state orders and/or due process.  Lynch never "indicated" that restraining orders have no effect on her behavior.  She has witnessed judges routinely fabricate information about her.  That now includes Robert Hess arguing that she was served Leonard Cohen's lawsuit when she and approximately six individuals have confirmed otherwise.  Lynch has no remorse and is quite aware of the fact that neither does this court system which routinely issues fraudulent orders without jurisdiction or due process.  

Lynch has in fact stayed away from Cohen.  Nevertheless, the fraud California DV order has no terms, conditions, and does not contain an expiration date. The Colorado court order, which has never been modified, could only be modified by the Colorado court that maintained exclusive modification jurisdiction.  The Boulder Combined Court has confirmed in writing that their order is not a domestic violence order.  They have informed Lynch and others that their order can never be converted into a domestic violence order.  This is irrelevant to LA Superior Court.  Lynch did not violate her probation.  She was retaliated against using Gianelli's harassing communications.  The orders are unconstitutional and fraudulent.  Lynch has never stated that she is not "bound" by them and the courts refuse to terminate them after the protected party's death.  They also refuse to inform the local, state, and federal databases that the protected party has passed away.  In fact, LA Superior Court has continued to issue fraudulent domestic violence orders after Cohen's death.  Lynch has not violated the court orders through Cohen's death.  Robert Vanderet is not hearing the case at this time.  If he was, Lynch would ask that he recuse himself.  The judge hearing this case is Debra Brazil.  Lynch has no idea, at this time, if she believes sexual harassment, sexual assault, and/or indecent exposure are considered "dating" in California.