February 20, 2017 at 7.43 AM

From: Sandra <sandra123@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 7:43 AM
Subject: Your blog posted email of 2/20 falsely accusing Sandra Jo Streeter of perjury and other misconduct
To: kelley.lynch.2016@gmail.com



First, the association to whom you wrote has no disciplinary authority.

But it's membership includes every deputy city attorney who might be assigned to prosecute you in the future, and if your crackpot, malicious, and harassing reputation has not reached them prior to today it has now (or, rather, when your email makes the rounds aftr the Memorial Day break).

In 2010 accused the judge Freeman (who signed the embezzlement based $5M judgment against you in 2006) of "corruption" and misconduct. You repeated these allegations to Judge Freeman's clerk and court reporter. You have publicly made simular allegations of "misconduct" against every judge you have appeared in front of in California and in Colorado - including about Judge Robert C. Vanderet who sentenced you to 18-months in jail upon your April 2012 conviction of multiple counts of electronic harassment and restraining order violations, and including against the judge who found you violated your probation in 2014 (by sending Sandra Jo Streeter death threats) and remanded you for another 6-months behind bars. You also said the same thing about Judge Carolyn Enichen, who was the judge who issued the 2008 Colorado restraining order against you. You later called her "stupid" and remarked that she did not recognze that the restraining order proceding was "an IRS matter" over which Judge Enichen "had no jurisdiction". You made this false claim even though the transcript proves that you appeared at the hearing and REQUESTED that Judge Enichen issue the order - even after she explained that if you ever contacted the protected person you could be sentenced up to 18-months in jail per violation. 


You have also disparaged every attorney who has ever opposed you, and you have filed multiple complaints about prosecutors and attorneys in California and in Colorado, including the Boulder County District Attorney, the Los Angeles County District Attorney, Los Angeles County Deputy District Attorneys, and members of the bar who have displeased you. (Bergman, Kory, Rice and others.)

You have relently harassed the courts, their staffs, the IRS, the Franchise Tax Board, the Judicial Council, and many other public officials.

Your chickens are comming home to roost.

Unitl 2012 you were incredibliy lucky - and you moved around alot - but in 2012 you pushed your luck too far and it ran out.

You have gone too far once again, you are back in trouble - big trouble (9-years in jail worth) and you are seemingly hellbent on prejudicing all potential prosecutors, judges and their personeel against you.

You had your fun harassing the world and flaunting the orders of the court.

Now it is time to pay your bill. With jail time.

Commentary:  Lynch is aware that the association has no discipline authority.  She asked for their guidance and was advised to contact the City Attorney's personnel department.  She refuses to communicate with them and believes any communications would be useless.  Lynch previously complained about Streeter to this office and was threatened with arrest.  This is one of the dirtiest entities Lynch has ever encountered.  Her views on this office have been made public and also addressed with the court.  

Lynch has no idea if Judge Freeman is corrupt or not.  She cannot believe a court would enter the judgment it did.  No accountings were presented to the court.  That includes corporate accountings.  The default judgment involves $5 million in fabricated damages and millions of dollars in fraudulent financial interest.  The corporations and their assets were not valued.  Lynch's commissions were not addressed in the fabricated expense ledgers.  Plaintiffs actually informed the Court that Traditional Holdings, LLC was a suspended entity but it was inserted into the judgment in any event.  Lynch did not advise Freeman's court reporter that he was corrupt.  She asked if he would like to pay the judgment.  Lynch does have a problem with the judges she has been before.  Robert Vanderet refused to permit Agent Luis Tejeda and/or Lynch's son to testify during her 2012 trial.  He permitted Cohen to fabricate testimony rather than relying upon the best evidence rule.  Lynch never sent Streeter "death threats" and Lynch suggests that FBI review the email she sent FBI/DOJ on Valentine's Day 2013 as an example of the false threat scam being run by the City Attorney and other government officials in LA.  Carolyn Enichen was the judge in the Colorado matter.  Lynch has said that Enichen doesn't speak for her and should not have advised her that Lynch agreed to any order based upon fraud and perjury she was unaware of.  That includes the fraudulent Colorado order.  Enichen raised the IRS - not Lynch.  Lynch noted during the proceedings that the IRS was not present as a witness to her communications with IRS that were evidently at issue.  The Colorado order was immediately used to inform IRS that a corporate 1099 violated the order.  Therefore, it was immediately used to interfere with federal tax and corporate matters.  

Leonard Cohen has had an army of lawyers willing to lie for him in every court in which they've appeared, legal pleadings, declarations, and so forth.  Lynch does not glorify people who commit fraud upon the court and lie under oath.  Lynch has no idea what is going on with the Boulder DA.  The FBI in Denver asked her to contact them to investigate an issue whereby Boulder PD rolled into her offices in Colorado.  Gianelli has informed Lynch that Spector's prosecutor, former DDA Pat Dixon, was behind that incident.

At no time has Lynch harassed any court or their staffs including over fraudulent pleadings that are routinely transmitted to her electronically.  Lynch raised grievances with the Boulder Combined Court related to lawyers representing Cohen after his death and endless fraud being transmitted to the court.  She also addressed this issue with an investigator with the Colorado Supreme Court.  Lynch has not harassed IRS, FTB, Judicial Council, or any public official.  This is an attempt to elicit information as to what IRS, FTB, and Judicial Council may have communicated to her.

Lynch would like FBI to note that she is being threatened with jail over federal tax matters, IRS filing and reporting requirements, etc. by the City Attorney, Stephen Gianelli (including through his online public attacks), sandra123 and others.  

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

March 8, 2017 at 10.00 PM

March 2, 2017 at 7.19 AM