February 20, 2017 at 5.16 PM

From: Sandra <sandra123@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 5:16 PM
Subject: Blog posts
To: kelley.lynch.2016@gmail.com



Since you admit (even republished on your blog) your emailed and UPS mailed letter to a protected person under a restraining order, following your unsuccesssful September 2 motion to vacate the CA registration of that order - all proving you knew the order existed, was valid and prohibited the communications - how in the world could you ever imagine that you will escape at least two convictions of 273.5 PC (each carrying one year each in jail)?

In view of Judge Vandereet's on-rhe-record comments at your 2012 sentencing, including about your lack of remorse, the 18-month prior sentence, your probation violation and subsequent 6-month sentence, the fact that your victim (the same victim) was sick and dying when you violated the restraining order again in 2016, the other counts, and your admitted (in emails and on your blog) lack of remorse and other harasment for more than 4-years after your conviction- how could you emagine that you are not going to jail for years this time?

Commentary:  This email is an attempt to elicit information about Lynch's defense, federal tax matters, IRS reporting and filing requirements, and her motion to vacate the fraudulent domestic violence order issued without minimal due process.  Judge Vanderet evidently has no shame as Lynch is the individual, together with her family members and friends, who have been relentlessly harassed and targeted.  That includes, but is not limited to, witnesses who have submitted declarations to LA Superior Court.  Who knows if Cohen was sick and dying in the summer of 2016.  He evidently died when he got up in the middle of the night and fell.  Perhaps the City Attorney would like to hand over his medical records.  

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

From:  Sandra  <sandra123@gmail.com> Date: Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 8:19 PM Subject:  To: kelley.lynch.2016@gmail.com As you stand before the court in the morning in a serious criminal case that - if you are convicted - could result in a 9-year jail sentence (which would translate to an actual 4 and a half years behind bars) - keep in mind that the sole reason that you are in that position is not some conspiracy, it is not a result of the conduct of others, your situation is entirely the result of your continual refusal to obey a facially valid order of the court, your prior criminal record of convictions and probation violations, and your 14 year history of electronic harrassment. Commentary:  The reasons Lynch is in this position is due to the fact that she reported allegations that Cohen committed criminal tax fraud, he and his representatives retaliated, and the DA dragged her into the Phil Spector case.  The fraud California domestic violen...
Read more

March 8, 2017 at 10.00 PM

From:  Sandra  <sandra123@gmail.com> Date: Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 10:00 PM Subject: Blog post of today To: kelley.lynch.2016@gmail.com I find it extremely ironic that you are all lathered up about a strightfoward website maining consisting of an archive of pleadings in your various legal matters with Leonard Cohen, with three FAQ;s that consist of stright foward anwers to your primary legal contentions that aree not onlysupported by the evidence but have also been so found by the court. This is ironic due to your many wibsites and tens of thousands of blog posts over the last seven years that consist mainly of your warped, self-serving, and factually and legally unsupported hyperbole about these matters. At a minumum there should be a dispassionate rebuttle to your daily diatribes based on facts and actual court documents and judicial rulings. Commentary:  Lynch is not lathered up about the Fact Check blog that is Leonard Cohen's defense to crimi...
Read more

March 2, 2017 at 7.19 AM

From:  Sandra  <sandra123@gmail.com> Date: Thu, Mar 2, 2017 at 7:19 AM Subject: Blog posted, harassing emails To: kelley.lynch.2016@gmail.com I am sure that the emails you are posting on your blog are just the tip of the iceberg, and that in actuality you are sending out far more emails to the City Attorney and his deputies. Have you read Penal code section 653M, or do you simply believe that everything you write is so important and legitimate that you have an unqualified right to say it, to whomever you wish, as many times as your whims dictate? Don't be suprized if you pick up additional charges (if Bruce Cutler alone decides to request charges, that would be hundreds of additional counts) or wind up remanded. You just cannot keep scoffing at court orders and the Penal Code while taunting prosecutors without consequences. Commentary:  Lynch continues to document everything that unfolds for IRS, FBI, DOJ, and other authorities.  Lync...
Read more