February 19, 2017 at 12.11 PM

From: Sandra <sandra123@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, Feb 19, 2017 at 12:11 PM
Subject: blog posts comment
To: kelley.lynch.2016@gmail.com



You seem very confused about venues, procedures and who your prosecutor is.

You really should ask the court to appoint the public defender to represent you. You don't have a clue.

The prosecutor in 6CJ03685 (who is not Ms. Streeter) only has an obligation to produce the 
very limited discovery enumerated in the statute (1054 and following), and only then 30 days before trial. Therefore, until a trial date is set, no discovery need be produced and your only remedy for non-production is a noticed motion (not an email).

Your trial prosecutor has nothing to do with pending procedings in Boulder Combined Court, and Colorado counsel has nothing to do with your prosecution in 6CJ03685.


Neither the IRS nor Ms. Streeter is involved in any of the above.

Commentary:  Lynch is not confused about who her prosecutors are at all.  She now intends to file State Bar Complaints related to their ongoing misconduct.  Streeter was the original prosecutor in Case No. 6CJ03685.  The prosecutors have nothing whatsoever to do with the fraudulent Boulder proceedings but have attempted to insert themselves into it.  They are not enforcing the Colorado order.  That order is not a domestic violence order and VAWA is inapplicable to the civil harassment order.  The statement about IRS is an attempt to elicit information about Lynch's communications with IRS including with respect to the fraudulent charges, retaliatory proceedings, and so forth.  Streeter has recused herself.  Lynch is quite relieved about that as she is aware of the fact that Streeter blatantly transmitted false statements to jurors during her 2012 trial and won a conviction using perjured and fabricated testimony, lies about federal tax matters, and so forth.  Unfortunately, her colleagues also seem to have a problem with honesty.  


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

From:  Sandra  <sandra123@gmail.com> Date: Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 8:19 PM Subject:  To: kelley.lynch.2016@gmail.com As you stand before the court in the morning in a serious criminal case that - if you are convicted - could result in a 9-year jail sentence (which would translate to an actual 4 and a half years behind bars) - keep in mind that the sole reason that you are in that position is not some conspiracy, it is not a result of the conduct of others, your situation is entirely the result of your continual refusal to obey a facially valid order of the court, your prior criminal record of convictions and probation violations, and your 14 year history of electronic harrassment. Commentary:  The reasons Lynch is in this position is due to the fact that she reported allegations that Cohen committed criminal tax fraud, he and his representatives retaliated, and the DA dragged her into the Phil Spector case.  The fraud California domestic violen...
Read more

March 8, 2017 at 10.00 PM

From:  Sandra  <sandra123@gmail.com> Date: Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 10:00 PM Subject: Blog post of today To: kelley.lynch.2016@gmail.com I find it extremely ironic that you are all lathered up about a strightfoward website maining consisting of an archive of pleadings in your various legal matters with Leonard Cohen, with three FAQ;s that consist of stright foward anwers to your primary legal contentions that aree not onlysupported by the evidence but have also been so found by the court. This is ironic due to your many wibsites and tens of thousands of blog posts over the last seven years that consist mainly of your warped, self-serving, and factually and legally unsupported hyperbole about these matters. At a minumum there should be a dispassionate rebuttle to your daily diatribes based on facts and actual court documents and judicial rulings. Commentary:  Lynch is not lathered up about the Fact Check blog that is Leonard Cohen's defense to crimi...
Read more

March 2, 2017 at 7.19 AM

From:  Sandra  <sandra123@gmail.com> Date: Thu, Mar 2, 2017 at 7:19 AM Subject: Blog posted, harassing emails To: kelley.lynch.2016@gmail.com I am sure that the emails you are posting on your blog are just the tip of the iceberg, and that in actuality you are sending out far more emails to the City Attorney and his deputies. Have you read Penal code section 653M, or do you simply believe that everything you write is so important and legitimate that you have an unqualified right to say it, to whomever you wish, as many times as your whims dictate? Don't be suprized if you pick up additional charges (if Bruce Cutler alone decides to request charges, that would be hundreds of additional counts) or wind up remanded. You just cannot keep scoffing at court orders and the Penal Code while taunting prosecutors without consequences. Commentary:  Lynch continues to document everything that unfolds for IRS, FBI, DOJ, and other authorities.  Lync...
Read more