February 15, 2017 at 3.35 PM

From: Sandra <sandra123@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 3:35 PM
Subject: 2-23-2017 pretrial
To: kelley.lynch.2016@gmail.com



Your best only hope is to express how sorry you are for your years of harassment of Leonard Cohen, to plead guilty and throw yourself on the mercy of the court.

If you go to trial on 16-counts, you wll be convicted of 16-counts.


All of your prior obscene and threatening communications are admisible to show intent under Ev. Code sec.s 1101 and following.

Commentary:  This individual is obsessed with Lynch exhibiting remorse to the court with respect to the conduct of others.  The individuals incapable of expressing remorse are the entities that have issued fraudulent orders, judgments, and verdicts.  Lynch has no intent and there are no "obscene" and/or "threatening" communications.  Leonard Cohen, during Lynch's 2012 trial, took the stand and fabricated testimony.  He even testified that he obtained the fraudulent Colorado order because he was concerned Lynch might attend his concert one year later.  He failed to bring that concern to the attention of the Colorado court.  Leonard Cohen, a known fabricator and teller of tale tales, proved that he was willing to say and do anything.  He evidently hoped scholars would review his entirely perjured and fraudulent legal pleadings which are nothing other than a fabricated narrative, tactics, and his defense to the allegations that he and the corporations he controlled committed civil and criminal tax fraud.  One of Lynch's so-called prior bad acts, LA Superior Court's character assassination evidence code which allows parties such as the City Attorney to fabricate statements for jurors, related to former DA Steve Cooley and false accusations based upon hearsay.  If one has a fabricated narrative, and witnesses willing to perjure themselves, they are assured of victory before LA Superior Court.  That is most definitely Lynch's personal opinion.  She has witnessed this time and time again.  


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

From:  Sandra  <sandra123@gmail.com> Date: Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 8:19 PM Subject:  To: kelley.lynch.2016@gmail.com As you stand before the court in the morning in a serious criminal case that - if you are convicted - could result in a 9-year jail sentence (which would translate to an actual 4 and a half years behind bars) - keep in mind that the sole reason that you are in that position is not some conspiracy, it is not a result of the conduct of others, your situation is entirely the result of your continual refusal to obey a facially valid order of the court, your prior criminal record of convictions and probation violations, and your 14 year history of electronic harrassment. Commentary:  The reasons Lynch is in this position is due to the fact that she reported allegations that Cohen committed criminal tax fraud, he and his representatives retaliated, and the DA dragged her into the Phil Spector case.  The fraud California domestic violen...
Read more

March 8, 2017 at 10.00 PM

From:  Sandra  <sandra123@gmail.com> Date: Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 10:00 PM Subject: Blog post of today To: kelley.lynch.2016@gmail.com I find it extremely ironic that you are all lathered up about a strightfoward website maining consisting of an archive of pleadings in your various legal matters with Leonard Cohen, with three FAQ;s that consist of stright foward anwers to your primary legal contentions that aree not onlysupported by the evidence but have also been so found by the court. This is ironic due to your many wibsites and tens of thousands of blog posts over the last seven years that consist mainly of your warped, self-serving, and factually and legally unsupported hyperbole about these matters. At a minumum there should be a dispassionate rebuttle to your daily diatribes based on facts and actual court documents and judicial rulings. Commentary:  Lynch is not lathered up about the Fact Check blog that is Leonard Cohen's defense to crimi...
Read more

March 2, 2017 at 7.19 AM

From:  Sandra  <sandra123@gmail.com> Date: Thu, Mar 2, 2017 at 7:19 AM Subject: Blog posted, harassing emails To: kelley.lynch.2016@gmail.com I am sure that the emails you are posting on your blog are just the tip of the iceberg, and that in actuality you are sending out far more emails to the City Attorney and his deputies. Have you read Penal code section 653M, or do you simply believe that everything you write is so important and legitimate that you have an unqualified right to say it, to whomever you wish, as many times as your whims dictate? Don't be suprized if you pick up additional charges (if Bruce Cutler alone decides to request charges, that would be hundreds of additional counts) or wind up remanded. You just cannot keep scoffing at court orders and the Penal Code while taunting prosecutors without consequences. Commentary:  Lynch continues to document everything that unfolds for IRS, FBI, DOJ, and other authorities.  Lync...
Read more