February 1, 2017 at 3.08 PM

From: Sandra <sandra123@gmai.com>
Date: Wed, Feb 1, 2017 at 3:08 PM
Subject: 
To: kelley.lynch.2016@gmail.com




The legitimate business purpose exception only applies to a criminal harassment charge. It is not a defense to the violation of a restraining order.


Commentary:  This harassing email relates to the fraudulent PC 653m charges the City Attorney has brought against Lynch.  Those charges relate to legitimate communications with Robert Kory and Michelle Rice.  LAPD and the City Attorney have provided no basis whatsoever for their determination that these communications are not legitimate.  Throughout KL's 2012 trial, Leonard Cohen's own conduct was argued as Lynch's intent to Cohen.  That includes, but is not limited to, his willful refusal to provide Lynch with IRS required tax and corporate information for the years 2004 and 2005; Lynch's communications with IRS, FBI, DOJ, and other authorities; an FBI investigation into the Aryan Nation and meth labs; Lynch's concerns that her sons - including her then minor son - were being targeted by adult strangers (such as Stephen Gianelli); Cohen's sexual harassment (which involved routinely exposing his penis to Lynch; the fact that Cohen and Kory attempted to stir up a custody matter by falsely informing her younger son's father that she had sex with Oliver Stone while they were together; Lynch's comments to Dennis Riordan, Phil Spector's appellate attorney, that Cohen informed her that his gun stories about Phil Spector were nothing other than good rock 'n roll comments (Cohen now has three contradictory versions of that incident before LA Superior Court); and other disturbing issues.  Lynch has not violated any order and that includes the orders used against during her 2012 trial.  From late February 2009 through April 2014, the Boulder Combined Court informed Lynch others that their permanent order expired.  Lynch was unaware of the fraudulent California domestic violence order until the Spring of 2013 when LA Superior Court asked her, after requesting the case no. (BQ033717):  Is Leonard Cohen your boyfriend?  Lynch and Cohen were never in a dating relationship, there was and remains no domestic violence, and Cohen routinely sexually harassed, sexually assaulted, and exposed his penis to her for years.   LA Superior Court has merely assigned Lynch a dating relationship with a man who abused her for years.  They have no remedies for their fraud orders.  

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

From:  Sandra  <sandra123@gmail.com> Date: Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 8:19 PM Subject:  To: kelley.lynch.2016@gmail.com As you stand before the court in the morning in a serious criminal case that - if you are convicted - could result in a 9-year jail sentence (which would translate to an actual 4 and a half years behind bars) - keep in mind that the sole reason that you are in that position is not some conspiracy, it is not a result of the conduct of others, your situation is entirely the result of your continual refusal to obey a facially valid order of the court, your prior criminal record of convictions and probation violations, and your 14 year history of electronic harrassment. Commentary:  The reasons Lynch is in this position is due to the fact that she reported allegations that Cohen committed criminal tax fraud, he and his representatives retaliated, and the DA dragged her into the Phil Spector case.  The fraud California domestic violen...
Read more

March 8, 2017 at 10.00 PM

From:  Sandra  <sandra123@gmail.com> Date: Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 10:00 PM Subject: Blog post of today To: kelley.lynch.2016@gmail.com I find it extremely ironic that you are all lathered up about a strightfoward website maining consisting of an archive of pleadings in your various legal matters with Leonard Cohen, with three FAQ;s that consist of stright foward anwers to your primary legal contentions that aree not onlysupported by the evidence but have also been so found by the court. This is ironic due to your many wibsites and tens of thousands of blog posts over the last seven years that consist mainly of your warped, self-serving, and factually and legally unsupported hyperbole about these matters. At a minumum there should be a dispassionate rebuttle to your daily diatribes based on facts and actual court documents and judicial rulings. Commentary:  Lynch is not lathered up about the Fact Check blog that is Leonard Cohen's defense to crimi...
Read more

April 24, 2017 at 11.45 PM

From:  Sandra  <sandra123@gmail.com> Date: Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 11:45 PM Subject:  To: kelley.lynch.2016@gmail.com There is always a  settlement offer extended to every defendant at the pretrial. Indeed, one isssue you tried to raise during your postconviction appeal in 2012 was your claim that your public defenders failed to pass onto you an offer to plead guilty in exchange for a 4 month jail sentence (the implication being you would have take the offer). Your total jail exposure is now 9-years as currently charged. I seriously doubt - given your prior conviction of the same offenses with the same victim, your 18-month jail sentence, and your probation violation and reated additional 6-months in jail, not to mention the lack of remorse you displayed then and continue to display now, that the offer will be that good this time around. But I strongly suggest that you accept any proffered guilty plea that puts you behind bars for less than 2...
Read more